Protestant empire

Where Exactly Is Biblical Israel?

By , 1/14/12 05:07 PM ET

The phrase “Biblical Israel” often passes on the lips of Republican presidential contenders, representatives of the Netanyahu government, and Israeli settlers. But where exactly is this Israel of the Bible to be found?

Not in the Bible itself. The Hebrew Bible (known to Christians as the Old Testament and to Jews as the Torah or Tanakh) contains five different “maps.” These “maps” aren’t pictures, but lists of boundaries that define the Promised Land. None of them resemble the modern-day “Biblical Israel.” One map — surprisingly found in the book of Joshua, which describes an all-out holy war — suggests a regional federation in which the tribes of Israel overlap and coexist with local inhabitants.  Joshua chapter 15, verse 63 even states: “the Jebusites (local inhabitants of Jerusalem) and the People of Judah dwell together in Jerusalem until today.” This not only sounds like contemporary Jerusalem — a mixed city of Palestinians and Israelis — but also like a prophecy of how the division of Jerusalem might give way to dwelling together.

The closest we get to “Biblical Israel” in the Bible is a map buried in the book of Numbers in which the land spans from the Mediterranean Sea in the west to the Jordan River in the east.  The northern and southern boundaries don’t correspond to “Biblical Israel” at all.

If not the Bible, then where does “Biblical Israel” come from? It results from a series of decisions made by the British when they asserted their power and later controlled the Middle East. With increasing awareness of the rich oil fields paralleling the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and dreams of transporting this oil to Europe via the Mediterranean Sea, the British War Office began funding the efforts of the biblically driven Palestine Exploration Fund (PEF). The PEF aimed to prove the legitimacy of the Bible through scientific endeavors like archeology and mapping. In 1879, the British War Office published maps that became widely available in 1880.  The 26 sheets of hand-drawn maps present a Palestine conforming to the biblical formulae “from Dan to Beersheba” for the north-south axis and “from the Jordan to the Sea” for the east-west axis. Thus the Holy Land as a potential holding of a Protestant empire was born.

In 1922, the League of Nations approved the British map of Mandate Palestine that reintroduced the idea of the Jordan River as a border. 1922 marks the first time that Protestants ruled the Holy Land as well as the birthday of “Biblical Israel.” The Jews and Arabs who wanted this land for their own countries adopted the British map. Where the British saw the birthplace of Jesus and an excellent port for the shipment of Iraqi oil to Europe, Jews envisioned Israel and Palestinians imagined an independent Palestine.

From 1922 on, most Jewish nationalists recognized the Jordan as the ancient border that would one day define their state. This aspiration found fulfillment when Israel conquered the West Bank and reached the Jordan River in the 1967 war. The British map had a parallel impact on Palestinian nationalists. Although the Palestinian Arab Congresses held in the early 1920s rejected the British Mandate as well as the 1922 map, striking and rioting against both, the borders of the desired Palestine were constituted by the Mandate. The 1968 Palestinian National Charter makes the case most clearly: “Palestine, with the boundaries it had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible territorial unit.” The “biblical” land doubly claimed by Palestinians and Israelis results from the British administration of the Middle East.

Since the 1920s — indeed since the 1960s — there is much water under the bridge. In the symbolic lexicon of Israelis, the Jordan River, as in the Bible, represents the line between homeland and exile. In the very real experiences of Palestinians exiled across the Jordan as a result of the 1948 and 1967 wars, the Jordan River marks the difference between exile and homeland. Battles have been fought and, ultimately, a peace treaty signed between Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan that recognizes a span of the river as the border between them.

Right-wing religious groups, whether Israeli or Palestinian, aspire to rule all of “Biblical Israel” or “Historic Palestine.” In truth, these maps result from British colonialism and not from religious tradition. Religious ideas about this land are, in fact, more fluid, more flexible, and more accepting of the different peoples who live within its uncertain borders. or

Photograph from 1996 flight of shuttle Atlantis to space station Mir (NASA). or

“There was no Israel in 1709” – Clip from TV’s The West Wing highlights absurdity of US Palestine denial

[tube][/tube] or

Related Posts

Bats in a box First it was Saddam. Then Gaddafi. Now there's a vacancy for the West's favourite crackpot tyrant By Robert Fisk, Saturday, 19 March 2011 ... S...
And the beat goes on By Monsieur d'Nalgar, Friday June 8, 2012 ... This rant emanates from a Facebook conversation today that followed Maha's lament. Maha is a P...
And we better wake up President's fine words may not address the Middle East's real needs By Robert Fisk, Thursday, 19 May 2011 ... OK, so here's what President Bara...
Xenophobic panic "Conservatism Is True." By Andrew Sullivan, 16 Jun 2011 09:57 PM ... It's funny that Fareed Zakaria and I are now seen as beyond the conservati...
On the wilder shores of American Christianity George W Bush's new 'crusade': converting Jews to Christianity By Andrew Brown, November 14, 2013   Some people think George W Bush did ...
Feliz Navidad 2011 Merry Christmas (or click here for your choice of alternative winter holidays) to all, from high atop the Fidel Castro observation tower, overlooking ...
Unsayable The World War on Democracy By John Pilger, January 20, 2012 ... Lisette Talate died the other day. I remember a wiry, fiercely intelligent woma...
None of this is new The Road to “All Muslims are Terrorists” By Gefilte, 07 July 2011 ... It’s been travelled before. Aside from the fact that real democracies ...
You should be so lucky My President Is Busy By Thomas L. Friedman, November 10, 2012   Israeli friends have been asking me whether a re-elected President Obama w...
The criteria for service Romney’s scary Middle East advisor By As`ad AbuKhalil, Friday, Oct 7, 2011 10:00 AM 13:15:53 CDT ... Mitt Romney has a new foreign policy adv...

Permanent link to this article:


    • Mike Nunn on January 15, 2012 at 1:03 pm

    It is too bad that so many people get hung up on items such as this. The past means nothing in this case, but the future means everything. Somehow a way must be found to end this eternal bickering and get on with life. The first thing that should be done is to throw away the Bible and all of it’s ambiguity.

    • Jacques on January 16, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    Mike, you’re quite the evangelist for atheism. Ironic, ain’t it?!

    • Mike Nunn on January 17, 2012 at 7:46 am

    I am not advocating Atheism. I am just advocating a way out of the madness that has encompassed that region for centuries. Anyone who wants can believe in the Bible for their private philosophy. It just does not work when using it to settle international disputes- particularly in this case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.