Dangerous rightwing ideologies

The importance of the Anders Breivik verdict reaches beyond Norway

By , Friday 24 August 2012 15.00 EDT

 

There are many reasons to welcome the verdict in the trial of Anders Behring Breivik: that he is sane and legally responsible for the murder of 77 people – mostly members of the Norwegian Labour party – on 22 July last year.

The guilty verdict recognises the monstrosity of Breivik’s acts, carried out in pursuit of his political beliefs. It also delivers the outcome wanted by the majority of Norwegians, in particular because it means he will spend no fewer than 21 years – and most likely life – in jail. Justice has been done to the fullest extent possible under Norwegian law.

To understand the full import of the outcome, however, one needs to look to the wider realms of politics and society. The trial was dominated by the question of Breivik’s sanity for more than just procedural reasons.

Once it was realised a white, middle-class Norwegian man was the culprit and that he’d left a sickening but coherent 1,500-page manifesto for all to read, the race was on for some on the right to depoliticise Breivik’s acts. The problem was that his politics were not just similar to their own, but often drawn directly from their statements, cut and pasted into his tract. In many cases the only difference was that he took their language of a war of civilisations to its logical conclusion in violence.

It wasn’t just harder rightwingers such as Melanie Phillips, Mark Steyn and Pamela Geller who tried to deny the connection, but many more moderate writers and politicians. This should not be surprising, as Breivik’s opposition to Muslims, multiculturalism and a “cultural Marxist” fifth column was never far from the surface in the mainstream discourse of the war on terror. Norway, for all its famed tolerance, continues to be an active part of the Nato occupation of Afghanistan.

The main form this depoliticisation took was the medicalisation of Breivik’s actions in terms of psychological or psychiatric pathology. Within days, everyone from forensic psychiatrists to the London mayor, Boris Johnson, felt the need to put Breivik in a diagnostic box. Occasionally, even reportage of his personal history and psychology went to ludicrous extremes to seek his motives in anything but what he actually said. This reached its pinnacle with the first court-ordered psychiatric report, which found him to be suffering from “paranoid schizophrenia” on the basis of clumsy and inappropriate interpretation of ideas and behaviours common in far-right and online gaming subcultures.

Outrage over the findings led the court to take the unusual step of commissioning a second report. This one paid more attention to his political milieu, as well as his behaviour in jail, and found him sane – at most exhibiting signs of a personality disorder. Friday’s verdict confirms this conclusion and denies to Islamophobic ideologues the comfort of a clear line of sanity separating their influence from Breivik’s actions.

The verdict is doubly important as an intractable economic crisis across Europe provides opportunities for the advance of the far right. Virtually all of these rightwing parties disowned Breivik’s actions while singling out in their own propaganda the same groups he targeted. At one extreme, Greece’s neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party has seen its electoral support rocket to 7%, even as its thugs carry out violent attacks on migrants in the streets of Athens. But much wider networks of extreme rightwingers populate the internet and organisations of the populist right, exactly the spaces in which Breivik’s ideology and commitment to action were formed.

Friday’s verdict thus not only delivers justice, it also clarifies the connection between his crimes and how dangerous rightwing ideologies have infiltrated an apparently “sane” mainstream discourse. It is a problem that cannot be expunged simply by labelling it as mad, but must be tackled directly as the political threat to freedom and democracy it is.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/24/anders-breivik-verdict-norway1 or http://bit.ly/SxfclS

Photograph (modified) of Pamela Gellerhttp://deadsilencethemovie.com/?page_id=29

Related Posts

Time to rethink your theology My Take: Jesus would support Palestinian statehood bid By Carl Medearis, September 21st, 2011 12:27 PM ET ... This week at the United Nations, ...
We must fear them, hate them War on terror is the West's new religion By Robert Fisk, Sunday 24 February 2013   Mohamed al-Zawahiri, younger brother of Osama bin Laden...
On a hill far away ...stood an old rugged cross, the emblem of suffering and shame. (from a hymn by George Bennard, 1873-1958) ... For at least the last two thousa...
After decades of instant vilification Boston explosions: 'Please don't be Arabs or Muslims' By Khaled A Beydoun, 16 Apr 2013 09:25   I texted my friend at 7:47am EST, extending...
Lesley Hazleton: Accidental Theologist Lesley Hazleton at TEDxRainier: “Muhammad, You and Me” By Garibaldi, 08 December 2012   Lesley Hazleton, one of our favorite “anti-Loons” ...
The criteria for service Romney’s scary Middle East advisor By As`ad AbuKhalil, Friday, Oct 7, 2011 10:00 AM 13:15:53 CDT ... Mitt Romney has a new foreign policy adv...
The need to generalise Why 'they' still don't hate 'us' By Mark LeVine, 26 Sep 2012 08:07   I knew the title to my second book would be Why They Don't Hate Us ...
Nothing to fear Shariah Law: The Five Things Every Non-Muslim (and Muslim) Should Know By Qasim Rashid, 11/4/11 10:15 AM ET ... 1. What does Shariah mean? ...
American exceptionalism in action Jordan through evangelical Christian eyes – Disneyland with conversions By Becky Garrison, Tuesday 23 October 2012 03.30 EDT   I took a pr...
They go into your soul Jerusalem can do strange things to your sanity By Robert Fisk, Saturday, 8 October 2011 ... So there was this chap, a bearded guy, spectacles, ...

Permanent link to this article: http://levantium.com/2012/08/25/dangerous-rightwing-ideologies/

1 comment

    • Mike Nunn on August 28, 2012 at 9:58 am

    The only question I have – Why is not this complete idiot not dead yet? There should be some way for justice to end the existence of such worms. He could get out in 21 years?????

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.