Clinton, Obama, and Cluster Bombs

 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-rees/clinton-obama-and-clust_b_84811.html

For those of you who will be voting tomorrow on “Super Tuesday” and days following, this post has some relevance to the wee little “droppings” Israel left all over south Lebanon during the last days of its war with Hezbollah (or, as I still call it, “The Rape of Lebanon”)…

+++

Clinton, Obama, and Cluster Bombs

 Posted by David Rees February 4, 2008 at 10:51 AM (EST)

 If you’re a friend of mine, or a fan of “Get Your War On,” you probably know how important the issue of cluster bombs and landmines is to me.

 It was America’s use of cluster bombs during Operation: Enduring Freedom that led me to start GYWO seven(!) years ago this fall, and it has been my pleasure and my honor to donate the royalties from the two GYWO anthologies to Mine Detection & Dog Center Team #5, a landmine removal team in western Afghanistan.

 If you ever attended a GYWO reading, you probably sat through my video of landmine removal teams in the field, or listened to me read off statistics about that dangerous mission, or indulged me by taking an informational flyer about MDC Team #5 and the sacred work they do.

 (If you bought one of the GYWO books, you’ve helped that work, and I thank you.)

Cluster bombs and landmines are particularly terrifying weapons that wreak havoc on communities trying to recover from war. They are fatal impediments to reconstruction and rehabilitation of agricultural land; they destroy valuable livestock; they disable otherwise productive members of society; they maim or kill children trying to salvage them for scrap metal.

Over 150 nations have signed the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty. It pains me that our great nation has not. But in the autumn of 2006, there was a chance to take a step in the right direction: Senate Amendment No. 4882, an amendment to a Pentagon appropriations bill that would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas.

 Senator Obama of Illinois voted IN FAVOR of the ban.

Senator Clinton of New York voted AGAINST the ban.

Analysts say Clinton did want to risk appearing “soft on terror,” as it would have harmed her electability.

I’m not a single-issue voter. But as Obama and Clinton share many policy positions, this vote was revelatory for me. After all, Amendment No. 4882 was an easy one to vote against: Who’d want to risk accusation of “tying the hands of the Pentagon” during a never-ending, global War on Terror? As is so often the case, there was no political cost to doing the wrong thing. And there was no political reward for doing the right thing.

But Senator Obama did the right thing.

Is Senator Obama perfect? Of course not. Nobody who voted for 2005’s wack-ass energy bill is perfect. Nobody who voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act is perfect.

But of the two remaining Democratic candidates, one decided her vote on Amendment No. 4882 according to a political calculation. The other used a moral calculation.

I’m 35 years old, and over the years, I’ve had two experiences in the voting booth: I’ve voted for politicians I really respected, who I knew could never win. And I’ve voted for politicians I didn’t really respect, because I knew they could win.

Tomorrow, I’m going to vote for a politician I really respect, who I know can win.

Related Posts

The ongoing business of slaughtering the other Imploding the Myth of Israel By Chris Hedges, Nov 4, 2013   Israel has been poisoned by the psychosis of permanent war. It has been morall...
Flying spittle  I can imagine that in Mr. Greenberg's mind, any modern comparison to the Holocaust is tantamount to its diminution/dilution and therefore an insult t...
Where the Litani River runs House of Stone By Anthony Shadid, published February 18, 2012 ... The America that drew my family was 7,000 miles from where they started, in...
Patronizing myths die hard Arabs Give Neocons a Reality Check By James Zogby, 04/16/11 09:44 AM ET ... While much of what has come to be known as "the Arab Spring" remain...
Another odd element to our western outrage It was bizarre to watch Samantha Power at the UN conveniently forget to mention all the massacres done in America's name By Robert Fisk, Thursday 1...
We don’t care so much about the Palestinians, do w... Eight hundred dead Palestinians. But Israel has impunity By Robert Fisk, Friday 25 July 2014   Impunity is the word that comes to mind...
One man’s terrorist… Here's a bit of modern Israel's ancient history, excerpted from the August 13, 1949 issue of The New Yorker (thanks, Børre). This fascinating paragrap...
Keeping clean is a dirty business The Syrian army would like to appear squeaky clean. It isn't By Robert Fisk, Monday 27 August 2012   Every day, a new massacre is report...
Rebuilding the house of Isber Shadid Anthony Shadid yearned for home By Jefferson Morley, Friday, Feb 17, 2012 5:42 PM 12:45:46 CST ... Anthony’s Shadid’s now unbearably poignant...
We do sleep soundly The shocking truth that killing can be so casual By Robert Fisk, Saturday 07 January 2012 ... More horror arrives in the mail. Clive Bur...

Permanent link to this article: http://levantium.com/2008/02/04/clinton-obama-and-cluster-bombs/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.