Kind of hyperbolic

Those defending US Constitution from sharia must have failed high school civics

By Reza Aslan and Harris Zafar, February 29, 2012

There are those who would have you believe that Islamic law, or sharia, is taking over America. They seem to allege that the 1 percent of the American population that is Muslim is on the verge of a total takeover of the United States, and if Americans are not vigilant, soon we’ll all be stoning adulterers and chopping off the hands of thieves.

Take Rep. Allen West (R) of Florida, who recently alleged that, “there is an infiltration of the sharia practice into all of our operating systems in our country as well as across Western civilization. So we must be willing to recognize that enemy.”

If that kind of hyperbolic statement sounds ludicrous, it’s because it is. Yet nearly two-dozen states have proposed legislation to prohibit the use of sharia.

Yes, it is clear that all of these laws will share the fate of Oklahoma’s anti-sharia law, which was blocked by a federal court on the grounds that it was both unconstitutional and an attempt to solve a problem that does not exist. (Proponents of the measure could not cite even a single instance where an Oklahoma court had applied sharia law.) But the very existence of such laws is an indication of how disturbingly mainstream sharia hysteria has become in the US.

Perhaps no political figure exemplifies this reality better than Newt Gingrich, who has made a constitutional amendment banning sharia in America one of the cornerstones of his presidential campaign. Mr. Gingrich has called sharia “a mortal threat to the survival of freedom in the United States and in the world as we know it.” He claims, rather fancifully, that Muslims in the US want to manipulate sharia into US legislation.

If the former Speaker of the House wants the job of enforcing the Constitution, he should read Article VI, Clause 2 (also called the Supremacy Clause). It establishes the US Constitution as “the supreme law of the land,” making it impossible for any foreign law to supersede American law. Passing a Constitutional amendment banning sharia in the US would be akin to banning Americans from riding unicorns.

On this point let there be no confusion: It is utterly impossible for sharia to “take over” America. Anyone who says otherwise has failed high school civics.

Still, many Americans continue to fear sharia because of the brutal penal codes they see enforced in countries like Iran, Afghanistan, or Saudi Arabia. The draconian laws enacted by these countries – such as stoning for adultery or punishments against blasphemy and apostasy – are nowhere in the Quran and have no place in the modern world. All Muslims who support justice and human rights should fight their implementation.

But what happens in Iran, Afghanistan, or Saudi Arabia is not an indication of how Muslims in the United States practice their religion. American Muslims are just as unwilling as non-Muslims to accept sharia as a form of penal or civil code in the US legal system, according to a new study by University of Windsor law professor Judy Macfarlane for the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

That said, it is important to understand that sharia is not just a set of punishments. Sharia is a comprehensive code of conduct that guides Muslim beliefs and practices.

When Muslims wash their hands and feet before praying, that is sharia. When they refrain from eating pork or drinking alcohol, that is sharia. When they greet each other and say, “As-Salam Alaykum” (peace be with you) that is sharia.

When Muslims marry, or have children, or get divorced, or die and are buried, they do so according to the principles of sharia. Millions of other Americans – Jewish, Catholic, Mormon, and otherwise – follow religious codes in their daily lives and actions.

That is why the federal court blocked Oklahoma’s anti-sharia legislation. It is why all the similar laws being debated across the country will also ultimately be blocked. Muslims, just like all other religious communities in America, have the right to rely on their own religious laws to govern their day-to-day lives, as long as those religious practices do not inflict harm on others or violate state or federal laws.

Religious freedom is the law of this land, and those who seek to overturn it for one particular religious community or those who try to exploit sharia hysteria to foster fear of Muslims in the US not only fail to understand sharia. They also fail to understand America and the ideals of religious freedom upon which this country was built.

Reza Aslan is founder of AslanMedia.com and author of “No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam” and “Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in the Age of Globalization.” Harris Zafar is the National Spokesperson for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community – America’s oldest Muslim organization – and frequent lecturer about Islam around the country.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2012/0229/Those-defending-US-Constitution-from-sharia-must-have-failed-high-school-civics or http://bit.ly/xatHZS

Photograph of Sunday, August 22, 2010 Park51 (Cordoba House) protest, by David Shankbonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ground_Zero_Mosque_Protesters_11.jpg

Related Posts

According to the dictionary   I place an ear on the belly of this moment I hear wailing I place it on another moment - the same! - Sinan Antoon, Iraqi poet ...
Dangerous rightwing ideologies The importance of the Anders Breivik verdict reaches beyond Norway By Tad Tietze, Friday 24 August 2012 15.00 EDT   There are many reaso...
A new twinkie defense Was I Unfair to The Atlantic? By Matt Barganier, July 24, 2011 ... On Friday, I included The Atlantic in a list of sources that “ran with the u...
We are all guilty Too By The Observer (Arkansas Times), April 23 2015   There's an enemy out there, lurking in the dark. It's the enemy of every human being...
We’re in a frightening place The news coverage of the Norway mass-killings was fact-free conjecture By Charlie Brooker, Sunday 24 July 2011 22.07 BST ... I went to bed in...
Apoplexy of fear and hatred Brigitte Gabriel is a vicious and probably deranged Islamophobe By Hussein Ibish, October 1, 2009   A lot of readers seemed to benefit f...
Broadband terrorism Slaughter was killer's appetiser. It is the trial that is his main course By Dr. Matthew Feldman, Tuesday, 26 July 2011 ... The heart-stoppin...
They go into your soul Jerusalem can do strange things to your sanity By Robert Fisk, Saturday, 8 October 2011 ... So there was this chap, a bearded guy, spectacles, ...
Yes we apparently cannot Obama's Middle East Cluelessness By Scott MacLeod, 05/13/11 02:55 PM ET ... Friday's announcement of George Mitchell's planned resignation as t...
Lesley Hazleton: Accidental Theologist Lesley Hazleton at TEDxRainier: “Muhammad, You and Me” By Garibaldi, 08 December 2012   Lesley Hazleton, one of our favorite “anti-Loons” ...

Permanent link to this article: http://levantium.com/2012/03/01/kind-of-hyperbolic/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.