2 responses

  1. Monsieur d’Nalgar
    February 6, 2011

    From today’s “In my opinion” section, pages 10B & 11B:

    Without doubt, a Christian nation

    Christopher Columbus had set sail for the New World because he wanted to reach the East by traveling west across the Atlantic Ocean. After years of seeking financial aid for his expedition, he received it from Spanish monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella in 1492. Like Columbus, Ferdinand and Isabella were devout Christians and they all wanted to advance the religion. (Source: http:// http://www.associatedcontent.com.)

    Mayflower Compact: 1620 Agreement Between the Settlers at New Plymouth.

    “In the name of God, amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern Parts of Virginia; … In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the 11th of November, Anno Domini; 1620. ’’

    (Signed by 41 signatures while still on the Mayflower before landing.) (Source: The Federal and State Constitutions Colonial Charters, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, 1909.)

    The following are excerpts from “The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States,” published and printed in 1864:

    “The history and genius of the civil institutions of the United States must ever be a subject of profound thought and interest to the American citizen. Their establishment and progress to completed forms of government, and their influence and fruits upon millions of people and on the nations of the earth, constitute a new era in the science of civil government and the progress of human liberty, and commend them to the reverent study of the statesman, the patriot, the Christian, and the citizen.

    “The institutions of the North American republic had their birth and baptism from the free inspirations and genius of the Christian religion. This fact has given to the state its political power and moral glory, and shed new light on the benign nature and adaptation of the Christian system to secure the highest political prosperity to a nation. Christianity is the principal and all-pervading element, the deepest and most solid foundation, of all our civil institutions. It is the religion of the people – the national religion; but we have neither an established church nor an established religion.

    “An established church implies a connection between church and state, and the possession of civil and political as well as of ecclesiastical and spiritual power by the former. Neither exist in this country; for the people have wisely judged that religion, as a general rule, is safer in their hands than in those of rulers. In the United States there is no toleration; for all enjoy equality in religious freedom, not as a privilege granted, but as a right secured by the fundamental law of our social compact. Liberty of conscience and freedom of worship are not chartered immunities, but rights and duties founded on the constitutional republication of reason and revelation.”

    The theory and faith of the founders of the civil and political institutions of the United States practically carried out these statements. They had no state church or state religion, but they constituted the Christian religion the underlying foundation and the girding and guiding element of their systems of civil, political and social institutions. This proposition will be confirmed by the following summary of historic facts, which have an extended record in the various chapters of this volume.

    Object of the Founders of the Republic

    First. The Christian inspirations and purpose of the founders and fathers of the republic … as a grand and glorious fact with the wise and skillful workmen who, under God, created and completed the civil institutions of the United States. No claim to special inspiration from heaven is set up for the fathers of our republic. It would, however, be a violence to historic truth not to affirm and admit that they were under the special and constant guidance of an overruling Providence. The Bible, as the divine charter of their political rights, as well as of their hopes of immortality, they reverently studied, and on it laid the cornerstone of all their compacts and institutions. The Mosaic system of political jurisprudence, which “contains more consummate wisdom and common sense than all the legislators and political writers of the ancient nations,” the founders of the American republic thoroughly understood, and incorporated its free spirit and democratic principles into their organic institutions. (The Bible, as referenced here, was the first Bible translated from the Latin scriptures, the Geneva Bible, which predated the King James Version.)

    Secondly. The Christian men who formed our civil institutions were trained and prepared for their work in scenes of conflict in which the truest ideas of liberty and religion were developed. Great ideas, and the forward movements of the ages, have received their inspiration and impetus from civil and religious agitations and revolutions. This fact has its historic analogy in the conflicts that preceded the planting of a Christian republic on the North American continent. “The whole of the 16th century was a period of active preparation for future times; and all that is great in modern science may be said to have received its foundation in the agitations that grew out of that period of the world. It forms one of the grandest and richest eras in human history.” Whilst it was an age replete with the most splendid triumphs in science and literature, it was pre-eminent, also, for its elaboration and vindication of the fundamental principles of civil and religious liberty.

    The persecutions of the Puritans in England for nonconformity and the religious agitations and conflicts in Germany by Luther, in Geneva by Calvin, and in Scotland by Knox, were the preparatory ordeals for qualifying Christian men for the work of establishing the civil institutions on the American continent. “God sifted,” in these conflicts, “a whole nation, that he might send choice grain over into this wilderness;” and the blood and persecution of martyrs became the seed of both the church and the state. It was in these schools of fiery trial that the founders of the American republic were educated and prepared for their grand Christian mission, and in which their faith and characters became strong and earnest with Christian truth. They were trained in stormy times, in order to prepare them to elaborate and establish the fundamental principles of civil and religious liberty and of just systems of civil government.

    Thirdly. Thus inspired and prepared, the Christian men of Puritan times and of the Revolution presented and developed the true symbol of civil government.

    The above is the foundation of our forefathers in their establishing a new nation with a new concept of a government where the people controlled the design of their environ. For further evidence that this is a Christian nation, I challenge any who still deny this to go to http://www.AmericanVision.org, buy the book, “The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of The United States.”

    After reading the book and studying it thoroughly, I adduce you will agree we are a Christian nation, formed on Christian principles and beliefs.

    [name deleted]
    Hot Springs

    Reply

  2. Monsieur d’Nalgar
    February 6, 2011

    From today’s “Letters to the editor” section, pages 10B & 11B:

    Egypt’s unrest an omen?

    Dear editor:

    I see in the news that about 3 percent of Egyptians are rioting and demonstrating against their current ruler, Hasni Mubarak. President Obama seems to agree with them, that Mubarak needs to go.

    Not too long ago, a much bigger percentage of Americans let it be known that we didn’t want “Obamacare.” Nevertheless, it was shoved down our throats in a lame duck session of Congress. None of us caused the damage that we see in Egypt, we just had peaceful meetings and then we voted. Does President Obama prefer riots and violent demonstrations to effect change? Is he trying to convince American citizens that we should riot against “right-wing extremists?” You decide.

    M. Wayne Spencer
    Hot Springs

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top
mobile desktop