Intimately backed

Afghanistan: the big lie

Guardian editorial,

Joseph Goebbels said that if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The big lie told repeatedly about the war in Afghanistan is that the international security assistance force (Isaf) and the Afghan national security forces are pushing the Taliban back. This is Hillary Clinton‘s line. It is, heavily caveated, the line of the monthly progress report issued by the Foreign Office. It notes that recorded levels of violence fell significantly in the UK’s area of operations last year but that those gains were tempered by an increase in incidents in the east of the country. The insurgency remains resilient, but is under “significant and sustained” pressure in areas where Isaf and the Afghan national security forces are focusing their efforts.

Contrast that with what the US military privately think: “Though the Taliban suffered severely in 2011, its strength, motivation, funding and tactical proficiency remains intact … Many Afghans are already bracing themselves for an eventual return of the Taliban.” So says a report drawn up on the basis of 27,000 interrogations of 4,000 suspected Taliban and al-Qaida detainees leaked to the Times and the BBC. The sourcing is significant. True, the Taliban, a Pashtun nationalist force, would be hard put to recapture Kabul after a foreign withdrawal. But each salient detail of this report undermines the notion that a national security structure which will outlast the withdrawal of foreign troops is being built by Isaf.

That is not to say it will not work in some areas. But the holes in this sieve are significant enough, and they have all to do with identity and legitimacy rather than military tactics: the Taliban’s continuing ability to connect with the local population – they even run their own version of a Crimestoppers phoneline; the harassment, corruption and abuse pushing clients into their arms; the local deals done with Afghan government forces – and all this in the 11th year of this conflict. Attacks in the east of Afghanistan have gone up 800%, so that the British focus on three districts out of 14 in Helmand gives little clue about the displacement going on. The US report belies the notion that the policy of assassinating mid-level Taliban commanders (night raids are often little more than death squads) is having any lasting effect on an organisation which retains the ability to selectively moderate its violence in order to encourage Nato forces to leave faster.

The Taliban is heavily backed by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence – “intimately backed” are the words used – but even if the ISI withdrew its support, the Taliban would continue. It is showing no signs of being bombed to the peace table. The insurgents believe their will is stronger than that of the foreigners fighting on their soil. At some point this truth must be acknowledged.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/01/afghanistan-the-big-lie-editorial or http://bit.ly/yIYkbj

Photograph:  http://fachanwalt-fuer-it-recht.blogspot.com/2011/08/wollt-ihr-den-totalen-krieg.html

Related Posts

Three flickers of light What America Learned in Iraq By John A. Nagl, March 19, 2013   The costs of the second Iraq war, which began 10 years ago this week, are s...
A debt to pay Lessons in humanity from a Libyan family, a tale of Dickens from Cairo – and the wrong shark By Robert Fisk, Saturday, 22 October 2011 ... It's...
Before the stupidest Western war in the history of... Iran, not Syria, is the West's real target By Robert Fisk, Friday 30 August 2013   Before the stupidest Western war in the history of the ...
Peaceable revolution America's Dumbest Congressman says 'Selma' shows why we should fight 'radical Islam' By Hunter (Daily Kos staff), Fri Jan 23, 2015 at 09:53 AM PST ...
A frenzy of empty bombast and portending Ted Cruz & the new McCarthyism: Inside a dangerous response to the atrocity in Paris By Elias Isquith, Saturday, Jan 10, 2015 07:15 AM CST &nb...
Sorry means never It's Blair I feel really sorry for By Mark Steel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 ... Isn't it marvellous that all these governments are determined to...
This one will run and run Does Obama know he’s fighting on al-Qa’ida’s side? By Robert Fisk, Tuesday 27 August 2013   If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian r...
A fashion appendage Do those who flaunt the poppy on their lapels know that they mock the war dead? By Robert Fisk, Saturday 05 November 2011 ... I turned on the t...
Dangerous farce The shady men backed by the West to displace Gaddafi By Patrick Cogburn, Sunday, 3 April 2011 ... In the restaurant of the Amal Africa hotel ...
Until we awake The Collapse of Globalization By Chris Hedges, Mar 27, 2011 ... The uprisings in the Middle East, the unrest that is tearing apart nations such...

Permanent link to this article: https://levantium.com/2012/02/01/intimately-backed/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.