Monsieur d’Nalgar: This latest exercise in unabashed paranoia, part of a long series of frothy rants by the inimitable [name deleted], appeared in today’s issue of The Sentinel Record.
I keep hearing and reading that there needs to be “discussion” on the gun control issue, but the “discussion” ends up being one sided — the liberal, anti-Second Amendment side. Chuck Baldwin (http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/) has a lot to say on the subject and it would be worth one’s while to read him. He has said, in part:
“Throughout the United States there are tens of millions of fully armed citizens who are more than capable of defending themselves and their communities against any enemy — whether that enemy is an internal or external one. In fact, many millions of these citizens have been trained in the U.S. Armed Forces. Firearms — especially semi-automatic rifles — in the hands of millions of American citizens is truly the only thing that stands between freedom and tyranny for the people of the United States. That Barack Obama and Dianne Feinstein want to disarm the American people should be considered an act of war against our liberties! In other words, ladies and gentlemen, this is a line in the sand that none of us can afford to ignore.”
The story of the match which ignited America’s War for Independence is no longer taught in our American history classes, the story of how, on April 19, 1775, some 800 British troops were dispatched to Concord, Mass., to arrest Sam Adams and John Hancock and to seize a cache of weapons known to be stored at Concord. Dr. Joseph Warren sent Paul Revere to warn Pastor Jonas Clark — at whose home the two men were staying — and he alerted his male congregants. About 70 men from the Church of Lexington met the Redcoats on Lexington Green. When they were commanded to lay down their arms, they refused, and the British immediately opened fire. Eight minutemen were instantly killed.
“Make no mistake,” Baldwin says: “Attempted gun confiscation ignited America’s War for Independence.” Then he quotes Pat Buchanan: “If the federal government attempts to confiscate the guns of the American people, there will be a revolution in this country.”
In light of Baldwin’s fear of the impending doom looming over our beloved and wonderful country, why has the Department of Homeland Security recently purchased 450 million rounds of hollow-point ammo? Why has the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ordered 46,000 rounds of high-powered ammo? And now the Social Security Administration is set to purchase 174,000 rounds of “.357 Sig 124 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition” that will be delivered to 41 locations across the country.
I am mystified. Why is our government, while making moves toward confiscating all our guns, loading up on the most powerful ammo themselves? Enough to kill every American several times over?
We must vehemently resist any attempts to infringe on our “right to bear arms.” Without the Second Amendment, we will be totally stripped of any ability to defend ourselves and our families. Mature, thinking Americans are convinced that those who are pushing to destroy the Second Amendment and confiscate our guns have the ultimate goal of doing something to our country that will cause our citizens to need their guns to protect themselves from the possible evil intentions of our government. (We have dropped our house phone. Those of you who like to dialog and/or disagree with me over the phone may call me at 282-3102.)
You don’t have to look too hard to debunk this hysterical idiocy. Here are just a few links:
Homeland Security Buying Ammunition (Again) by Brian Dunning
Profile of Chuck Baldwin by the Southern Poverty Law Center
Why NOAA Supposedly Ordered 46,000 Rounds Of Ammunition by Robert Johnson
And finally, if you Google the exact phrase “Dr. Joseph Warren sent Paul Revere to warn Pastor Jonas Clark” you’ll get over 4,000 hits as of this writing. Think maybe someone has organized a letter-writing campaign? Or has there been a mass outbreak of plagiarism? Fact is, this flummery has the ilk-prints of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Alex Jones, etc. all over it. Deluded, beguiled, and befuddled — if only opinions like his/hers (not sure which) were rare…
– Monsieur d’Nalgar