Repellent

pinochet

Wall Street Journal says Egypt needs a Pinochet – can it get away with that?

By , Saturday 6 July 2013 09.09 EDT

 

On Friday, the Wall Street Journal published an editorial entitled “After the Coup in Cairo”. Its final paragraph contained these words:

Egyptians would be lucky if their new ruling generals turn out to be in the mold of Chile‘s Augusto Pinochet, who took over power amid chaos but hired free-market reformers and midwifed a transition to democracy.

Presumably, this means that those who speak for the Wall Street Journal – the editorial was unsigned – think Egypt should think itself lucky if its ruling generals now preside over a 17-year reign of terror. I also take it the WSJ means us to associate two governments removed by generals – the one led by Salvador Allende in Chile and the one led by Mohamed Morsi in Egypt. Islamist, socialist … elected, legitimate … who cares?

Presumably, the WSJ thinks the Egyptians now have 17 years in which to think themselves lucky when any who dissent are tortured with electricity, raped, thrown from planes or – if they’re really lucky – just shot. That’s what happened in Chile after 1973, causing the deaths of between 1,000 and 3,000 people. Around 30,000 were tortured.

Presumably, the WSJ hopes a general in the mold of Pinochet (or generals, as they didn’t break the mold when they made him) will preside over all this with the assistance of Britain and America. Perhaps he (or they) will return the favour by helping one of them win a small war.

Presumably, eventually, the Egyptian general or generals – and we should let them have a junta if they want one, so long as it isn’t like that beastly example in Argentina – will willingly relinquish power. After all, democracy cannot “midwife” itself. Presumably, the WSJ is sure a transition to elected government will follow, as it did in Chile. (Although, in 15 years’ time the Argentinian writer Ariel Dorfman’s words will, presumably, ring as true as they do now: “Saying Pinochet brought democracy to Chile is like saying Margaret Thatcher brought socialism to Britain.” More of her later.)

Such quibbles notwithstanding, I’m presuming the WSJ envisages that the Egyptian general or generals will then be allowed to retire, unmolested. Possibly to Wentworth, where the golf’s good. But if any molestation does occur, perhaps by some uppity human rights lawyer, they will receive further assistance from the governing classes of Britain and America. He or they will then retire and, unlike his or their victims, die a free man – or men – in bed.

And presumably, after another 20 or 30 years, when some other group of generals removes a democratic government upon which the Wall Street Journal is not keen, the people of the fortunate country in question will be told what is good for them in the same breathtakingly ugly way.

I am not an expert on Egypt, or Chile – most of my knowledge about General Pinochet comes from a book by a Guardian writer, Andy Beckett. But I know enough that when Margaret Thatcher died, reminders of her enduring support and praise for Pinochet left a nasty taste in the mouth. While people are dying in the streets of Cairo, to read an expression of the same sentiment from a respected, globally-read newspaper is repellent.

So just why does General Augusto Pinochet attract such nostalgic, unquestioning support from some on the free-market right? Do they simply overlook the accepted fact that thousands were tortured and killed under his rule?

Perhaps this might be a case of “Say what you like about Mussolini, but he made the trains run on time“? Bernie Ecclestone, the chap who runs Formula One motor-racing, tried it a couple of years ago – albeit he said it about Hitler (and Saddam Hussain), and we don’t stand for that. Even Britain’s Daily Mail was upset.

Presumably, the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board believes that because Pinochet “hired free-market reformers”, he should be excused the excesses of a few death squads. That is, presumably, why they think a business-friendly cold killer in the Pinochet mold is who Egyptians need now to manage their “transition to democracy”.

But really, I’m at a loss. There must be some sort of justification for such a statement. I just haven’t the slightest clue what it is.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/06/wall-street-journal-editorial-egypt-pinochet or http://bit.ly/15mlPwB

Portrait of Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet by lapatahttp://www.flickr.com/photos/lapata/5979772368/

Related Posts

Warmongers’ wet dream What War With Iran Might Look Like By Philip Giraldi, Thursday, 12 January 2012 16:34 ... Back in September 2007 I wrote an article for Antiw...
Core values This is not about 'bad apples'. This is the horror of war By Robert Fisk, Friday 13 January 2012 ... So now it's snapshots of US Marines piss...
Grovelling to Netanyahu The 'invented people' stand little chance By Robert Fisk, Saturday 14 January 2012 ... Thank goodness we don't have to hear Newt Gingrich for a...
We do sleep soundly The shocking truth that killing can be so casual By Robert Fisk, Saturday 07 January 2012 ... More horror arrives in the mail. Clive Bur...
Indigènes France's shamefully forgotten allies By Robert Fisk, Saturday 31 December 2011 ... It took Indigènes to remind the French that they owed thei...
Religious impulse revealed 2011: when protest turned peaceful By Peter Popham, Saturday 24 December 2011 ... In September, a man nicknamed "Little Gandhi" was buried in h...
Protect the system of domination Bonfire of the dictators By Robert Fisk, Saturday 31 December 2011 ... How come they lasted so long? We are so keen to analyse the rev...
Guilt beyond doubt For the families of Haditha, this is a matter of honour By Nick Broomfield, Friday 13 January 2012 16.30 EST ... It was more than six years ago...
Protestant empire Where Exactly Is Biblical Israel? By Rachel Havrelock, 1/14/12 05:07 PM ET ... The phrase "Biblical Israel" often passes on the lips of Repub...
Old herrings An attack on Tehran would be madness. So don't rule it out By Robert Fisk, Saturday 04 February 2012 ... If Israel really attacks Iran this y...

Permanent link to this article: https://levantium.com/2013/07/06/repellent/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.